|
|
Post by Datatron on Aug 1, 2005 19:22:14 GMT -5
Ok, i'm sitting here with Handstanderson and we're discussing the legality of sexual relations with a hot co-worker at the tender age of 16.
Anyone know what the real laws are? I always thought once you hit 18 you can't pork anyone younger than 18. He's not so sure that's true. It changes from state to state I think, so lets stick to PA.
|
|
Poncho
New Member
Wood Mittens
Posts: 12
|
Post by Poncho on Aug 1, 2005 19:41:46 GMT -5
alright, so after some extensive online research... actually looking at one website... i think this is how it goes: the age of consent is 16, so if both parties are of or over the age of consent, its A-OK. However, if either party is under the age of 16 and one is over, it can be considered statutory rape. but i dont know if thats 100% right, feel free to correct me. because that would mean that a 45 year old dad is legally permitted to have relations with his daughter's hot 16 year old friend... and that just doesnt sound right to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by dharrisburg on Aug 1, 2005 20:59:12 GMT -5
you better believe I would tap that 16 year old ass
|
|
|
|
Post by Ed Blammo on Aug 1, 2005 23:57:01 GMT -5
are you serious?
first of all, if you have to check online, she's probably too young.
second of all, how could neither of you know that? if you're over 18 and you have sex with anyone 16 or younger its statutory rape.
third of all, if you're over 18 and you're having sex with 16 year olds, you're a scumbag, and a total loser.
|
|
|
|
Post by Datatron on Aug 2, 2005 0:08:25 GMT -5
Come on Blammo, what if it's true love? Like when you hooked up with Terence's cousin...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ed Blammo on Aug 2, 2005 0:25:47 GMT -5
i'm not even gonna touch that one
|
|
|
|
Post by dharrisburg on Aug 2, 2005 1:14:01 GMT -5
third of all, if you're over 18 and you're having sex with 16 year olds, you're a scumbag, and a total loser. Or you live in ski towns 10 months a year. |
|
|
|
Post by Ed Blammo on Aug 2, 2005 1:25:51 GMT -5
wow
|
|
|
|
Post by dharrisburg on Aug 2, 2005 1:36:40 GMT -5
hahahaha I probably wouldn't beat the cheeks but depending on the situation some wang touching might be in order |
|
|
|
Post by Datatron on Aug 2, 2005 5:21:08 GMT -5
Joking aside, I'll need to agree with Ed (we all know no one has hooked up with Leo's sister... yet). There's something morally incorrect about being with someone that much younger than you until she's like at least 21. Until you both peak that age barrier, I think people should try to only keep about two years between them tops. Especially if you're only looking for a good time. There's plenty of girls your age that wanna get sloppy and disgusting.
Plus I can only imagine how annoying serious conversation with at 16 year old would be at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by CANILIVE on Aug 5, 2005 0:21:57 GMT -5
LEO HAS A SISTER!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Poncho
New Member
Wood Mittens
Posts: 12
|
Post by Poncho on Aug 6, 2005 13:19:00 GMT -5
Plus I can only imagine how annoying serious conversation with at 16 year old would be at this point. who's talking about having conversations??? |
|
|
|
Post by Ed Blammo on Aug 8, 2005 0:19:21 GMT -5
is "What's Mo-happening?" considered conversation?
|
|
|
|
Post by dharrisburg on Aug 8, 2005 13:24:35 GMT -5
is "What's Mo-happening?" considered conversation? ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha |
|
Poncho
New Member
Wood Mittens
Posts: 12
|
Post by Poncho on Aug 12, 2005 18:21:45 GMT -5
i think thats more of an excellent pick-up line/ conversation starter than a conversation
|
|
